查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 限定繼承、遺產稅協力義務與漏稅處罰--最高行政法院94年度判字826號判決評析
- 論稅捐債務及稅捐處罰案件於稅務訴訟之舉證責任--最高行政法院96年度判字第1556號判決評釋
- 對營業人漏進、漏銷及逃漏營業稅之處罰--行政法院八十九年度判字第三六四號判決及司法院大法官釋字第五○三號解釋評釋
- 限定繼承對遺產稅徵收之影響
- 初探納稅義務人違反協力義務是否即該當漏稅處罰過失要件
- 初探納稅義務人違反協力義務是否即該當漏稅處罰過失要件
- 利益均衡在稅法上之運用
- 稅捐協力義務與推計課稅
- 繼承新制下可否強制執行滯納遺產稅之繼承人固有財產
- 行政爭訟法實施十週年研討會系列之二--從行政法法理論租稅處罰相關案件證據適用之界限座談會
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 限定繼承、遺產稅協力義務與漏稅處罰--最高行政法院94年度判字826號判決評析=Limited Inheritance, Procedural Obligations in Estate Tax and Punishment of Tax Non-Compliance-Comment on Case No. 826, 2005 of Supreme Administrative Court |
---|---|
作者 | 黃士洲; Huang, Shih-chou; |
期刊 | 東吳法律學報 |
出版日期 | 20070400 |
卷期 | 18:3 2007.04[民96.04] |
頁次 | 頁247-276 |
分類號 | 567.23 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 遺產稅; 限定繼承; 協力義務; 漏稅罰; 法秩序一體性; Estate tax; Limited inheritance; Punishment of tax evasion; Taxpayer's procedural obligation; Concurrence of legal order; |
中文摘要 | 民事身份法與遺產及贈與稅法之間,存在著相當微妙的規範連結關係。就遺產稅而言,現行的總遺產稅制幾近全盤承接民法繼承篇關於遺產的權利、義務規定,作為遺產稅課徵的實體與程序要件;但遺產稅為公法上債務,雖亦屬廣義遺產的範園,然原則上不受私法的拘束,不過遺產稅對於繼承權、財產權的干預效果,實為繼承法的「制度性保障」(institutionelle Garantie)不容忽視的重要課題。本文擬以最高行政法院94年度判字826號遺產稅判決所涉限定繼承與遺產稅限時申報協力義務之間的關係為例,評析限定繼承人為履踐民法所定公示催告期間,非因過失而逾限辦理遺產稅申報,卻遭裁處鉅額漏稅罰的妥當性。試圖藉此案例說明遺產稅的課徵不宜動輒強調自身規範的獨立、優先性,仍應遵循民事繼承法既有規則與法理,實可避免過度干預,甚或淘空憲法對於繼承制度的保障意旨;同時檢討現行司法判決過度侷限於「形式合法性」的審查,疏於從比例原則與衡平的觀點,觀照課稅決定的「實質合法性」,以致於無法充分發揮人民權利保障的功能,特別是當納稅義務人非因故意違反協力義務,卻遭裁處不合比例的鉅額罰鍰時。 |
英文摘要 | A complicated legal combination exists between family and inheritance laws and estate and gift tax. Take estate tax for example, it takes almost all the legal relationship of inheritance regulated by civil code as tax prequisite. Although theoretically speaking, estate tax, the same as other taxes, is public obligation in nature and shall not be bound by civil law and agreements between private parties. However, we should not ignore the effect de facto that estate taxation may produce against the inheritance and property rights, especially in the perspective of “Institutional Guarantee”. This article is to comment the estate tax decision of 2005 No. 826 of Administrative Supreme Court. In this case, the plaintiff, as an heir, declared limited inheritance upon his father’s death. According to the civil code, the limited inheritance requires a six-month civil court procedure. But the tax administration disregarded such civil court procedure and fined NT$ 61 Million only for plaintiff’s noncompliance of the tax procedural obligation to file tax return within the due term. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。