頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 「分立政府」對於兩岸政策影響之初探:以1996-2004年行政與立法互動關係為例=The Impact of Divided Government on Cross-Strait Policies: The Interactions of the Excutive-Legislature from 1996 to 2004 in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 岳瑞麒; 吳重禮; | 書刊名 | 遠景基金會季刊 |
卷 期 | 7:1 民95.01 |
頁 次 | 頁1-52 |
分類號 | 573.07 |
關鍵詞 | 政黨政治; 分立政府; 一致政府; 行政與立法關係; 兩岸政策; Party politics; Divided government; Unified government; Executive-legislative relations; Cross-strait policies; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究從政黨政治的觀點切入,探討我國中央政府層級的行政與立法關係在不同時期之下,對於兩岸政策產生的影響。詳言之,本文旨在比較行政部門與立法部門為同一政黨所掌握的「一致政府」(Un-ified Government),以及行政部門與立法部門分屬不同政黨所控制的「分立政府」(Divided Government)型態,其對於兩岸政策的制定是否有顯著差異?亦即,以一致政府與分立政府之行政與立法關係為架構,比較是否因為政黨立場不同,對於政策制定呈現明顯的差異,甚至造成行政與立法之間意識形態的對峙與僵局?舉例來說,兩岸直航政策的制定,目的在於建構兩岸經貿關係的常態化與制度化,然而可能因為朝野政黨對於國家安全、兩岸對等,以及主權尊嚴的論述差距,造成政策制定的延宕與滯塞。鑑此,本研究以1996年5月至2004年5月期間,《聯合報》與《中國時報》等新聞媒體對於兩岸政策議題在行政與立法關係的報導,評析雙方「共識」、「協商」,以及「分歧」的互動情形。經由實證分析所得到的初步結論,在一致政府之下,行政與立法之間的共識性確實較高,且關係較為和諧,而在分立政府期間,行政與立法互動較易產生齟齬與對峙。此意味著,在分立政府之下,行政部門與立法部門更需強調政黨協商機制的建立與運作。當然,中央政府層級的行政與立法關係牽涉我國民主發展甚鉅,係值得研究者持續關注的議題。 |
英文摘要 | Divided government exists where different political parties control the executive and legislative branches in a political system. This has become a common feature of Taiwan's national and local political landscape. In the literature, scholars tend to disagree with each other concerning whether divided government leads to dysfunctional politics. This study attempts to shed some light on the issue by exploring the effects of divided government at the central-level on the Cross-Strait policies between Taiwan and Mainland China. We take advantage of the news reports of CrossStrait policies in United Daily News and China Times from May 1996 to May 2004 and examine the executive-legislative relations which are classified into three categories─“consensus,” “consultation,” and “disagreement.” Our findings indicate that the frequencies of consensus are indeed higher under unified government and it implies the executive-legislative relations are much more harmonious, while the disagreements and confrontations are common under divided government. We conclude that divided government is a field worthy of continued research on the part of comparative political scientists. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。