頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 經義折獄、刑獄治理與傳統法律的文化格局--從朱熹「戊申延和奏劄」談起=Chunqiu Jueyu, Governance of Crime and Cultural Matrix of Chinese Legal Tradition--On Arguments of Zhu Xi's "Memorial to Emperor Xiaozong" |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 江玉林; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
| 卷 期 | 87 民94.10 |
| 頁 次 | 頁1-66 |
| 分類號 | 587.121 |
| 關鍵詞 | 經義折獄; 原情定罪; 唐律疏議; 刑獄治理; 治理理性; 朱熹; 傅柯; Chunqiu Jueyu; Judgment with consideration of individual circumstances; Tang Lu Shu Yi; Governance of crime; Governmental rationality; Zhu Xi; Michel Foucault; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 經義折獄,或稱春秋決獄,乃是漢儒董仲舒在西元前二世紀所闡揚的刑獄審理原則。它的任務,固然首先在於透過於儒家經義的援引,以作為法律詮釋,亦即出罪入罪的基礎。然而,它真正的目的,卻是想要藉此完家德禮政教秩序的理想。就此而論,經義折獄所涉及的問題領域,顯然已經不只是現代法學方法論上有關法律解釋與適用的課題,它更是一個牽涉到要如何透過實際上法律的運作,而能夠將儒家德禮政教的完善理想,加以具體展現的實踐性問題。 不過,經義折獄在兩漢期間的發展,卻由於過於強調原志論罪的面向,亦即忽略了當初董仲舒根據《春秋》義理所強調「必本其事而原其志」的原初構想,於使它在後來不斷受到像是「腹誹」、「無將」、乃至於「誅心」的非議。儘管經義折獄在其後來的發展中,出現了這樣一種「歧出」的現象。但是,我們卻可以在數百年之後的《唐律疏議》中,看到了經義折獄構想的另一種可能發展結果,此即是所謂的原情定罪。 來加以處理等措置的深化,而使自己因此必須始終依附在儒家三綱五常的既定道德論述之中。 |
| 英文摘要 | In his conception “Chunqiu Jueyu”, Dong Zhong-Shu, the great Confucian of the Han Dynasty, was of the opinion that each Judge, when he coming to a decision about a criminal case, ought to take all concerned elements into account, including its objective facts as well as the subjective intention and motives of the criminal. The legal thoughts about punishment thereafter, for example, the principle of “judgment with consideration of individual circumstances” in the Tang Code or Zhu Xi’s viewpoints in “Memorial to Emperor Xiaozong”, were never against dong Zhong-Shu’s conception on how to decide criminal cases. According to Michel Foucault’s doctrine of “governmental rationality”, we could find the development of traditional Chinese legal thoughts and all these problems in “Chunqiu Jueyu”, “judgment with consideration of individual circumstances” or the “governance of crime” are conditioned by the moral discourses of Confucianism. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。