頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國家人權機構作為違憲審查的替代方案?=Can National Human Right Institution Replace Judicial Review? |
---|---|
作者 | 楊智傑; Yang, Chih-chieh; |
期刊 | 法政學報 |
出版日期 | 20051100 |
卷期 | 19 民94.11 |
頁次 | 頁173-202 |
分類號 | 581.23 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 國家人權機構; 違憲審查; 人權委員會; 監察院; National human rights institution; Judicial review; Human rights commission; Ombudsman; |
中文摘要 | 本文乃欲研究國家人權機構作為違憲審查替代方案的可能性。首先本文先簡單釐清人權委員會與監察院定位之爭,提出另一觀點,認為可以將兩機構合併。以做為目前權限爭議的解決之道。接著則繼續比較人權委員會與違憲審查兩者在維護人權上的功能,本文認為,在人權保障的功能上,違憲審查的效果比仌權委員會差,卻要耗費比較多的資源成本,故本文大膽建議以人權委員會作為違憲審查的替代方案。 |
英文摘要 | I want research the possibility that national human rights institutions replace of judicial review. First part of this article, I try to explain the difference and the sameness of human rights commission and the ombudsman, and offer the alternative solution to figure out the power-conflict problem between the two institutions. Second part of this article, I try to analysis the functions of judicial review and human rights commission. I propose that the human rights protection function of judicial review is less than of human rights commission, but the cost of judicial review is more than of human rights commission. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。