查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- The Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement: The Boomerang of Competitive Liberalisation?
- 探討澳洲、美國、與臺灣等三國學生之數字常識表現
- 保護兒童安全上網之國際趨勢--以美、澳為例
- 美國、日本、大陸、新加坡、澳洲與香港擬仿效G-7模式成立亞洲G-6
- 「協調」「和解」與「仲裁」﹣﹣澳洲、英國與美國的比較觀
- 「協調」「和解」與「仲裁」﹣﹣澳洲、英國與美國的比較觀
- 臺灣、日本、美國、加拿大、澳洲有關門診、急診、住院診察費之比較
- 民防組建與全民國防
- 紐、澳、美三國政府會計收支認列原則之比較研究
- 荷蘭、美國及澳洲植物新品種保護制度概況
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | The Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement: The Boomerang of Competitive Liberalisation?=澳美自由貿易協定:具有競爭力自由化的自殺? |
---|---|
作 者 | 李察.利佛爾; | 書刊名 | 澳洲研究 |
卷 期 | 6 民94 |
頁 次 | 頁111-144 |
分類號 | 558.6 |
關鍵詞 | 澳洲; 美國; 澳美經貿關係; Australia; U.S; FTA; Australia-U.S economic relations; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 不算太久以前,全澳花費相當大的精力研析貿易政策的制定。貿易政策之策略大抵可分為兩類。第一類貿易政策之策略聚焦於多邊貿易遊戲規則之演進,其假設是國家政策之本質是種自動化的工具,被用來導引這些規則朝有利於廣泛地增加當地產業競爭優勢的方向前進。在工黨全盛時期,亞太經合會(APEC)的發展即為此一遊戲。而澳洲單方面調降關稅就是當時執政的工黨政府達成此一目標的主要工具。第二類貿易政策策略則是跟隨著壓力團體政治的軌跡,其立論的假設是國家政策是許多相互衝突利益妥協的結果。可論證的是此一策略堪稱是研究貿易政策形成的最古老學派,而此一分析模式之所以在澳洲開始具有吸引力是其有助於瞭解澳洲最近的APEC政策。與進口競爭的澳洲產業舉行密集諮商被霍華德政府在一九九六年用來作為中斷工黨單方面調降關稅時間表之政策合理化的依據。 |
英文摘要 | Not all that long ago, considerable intellectual energy was spent across Australia analysing the formation of trade policy. And much as elsewhere, there were two basic approaches. The first approach focussed on the evolution of ‘the rules of the game’ in multilateral trade, stepping of from the assumption that national policy was essentially an autonomous instrument designed to leverage those rules in directions broadly favourable to local industries. Variants of this approach were common at the high tide of Labor governments when APEC was the name of Canberra’s game, and unilateral tariff reductions were its primary means for achieving that end. The second approach consisted of tracking the course of pressure group politics, and worked on the assumption that national policy was the vector outcome of many conflicting interests. Arguably the oldest of all intellectual approaches to trade policy formation – and certainly so in the US – this was beginning to have its attractions for understanding Australia’s more recent APEC policy, where intense consultations with import-competing local industries were used in 1996 to justify the suspension of Labor’s timetable of unilateral tariff reductions. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。