查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Curriculum: Who Initiates? Who Determines Priorities? Who is Responsible for what Happens? Lessons from Australia
- 課程實施程度的測量
- 從形式課程到實質課程--論教師層面的課程實施及其對師資培育的啟示
- 課程發展之行動研究:以國立中正大學教育學程之課程發展為例
- 從形式課程到實質課程--論教師層面的課程實施及其對師資培育的啟示
- 臺南市國中小教師對九年一貫課程試辦階段問題之研究
- 建構學校本位課程發展的推展情境
- 課程與教學的關係在教室層面上的探究
- 國中英語科教師使用新教材與教法研究--以臺南縣市為例
- 生命教育的課程實施
第1筆 /總和 1 筆
/ 1 筆
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Curriculum: Who Initiates? Who Determines Priorities? Who is Responsible for what Happens? Lessons from Australia=課程:誰發起?誰決定優先順序?誰負責所發生的?澳洲的經驗 |
---|---|
作者 | Marsh,Colin J.; |
期刊 | 教育研究與發展期刊 |
出版日期 | 20050600 |
卷期 | 1:1 2005.06[民94.06] |
頁次 | 頁63-77 |
分類號 | 521.7 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 課程倡議; 課程優先; 課程實施; 課程責任歸屬; Curriculum initiatives; Curriculum priorities; Curriculum implementation; Responsibility for curriculum; |
中文摘要 | 澳洲的課程決定大多取決於州以及國家(聯邦)層級。雖然教育屬於州層級的職責,但最近幾年聯邦政府對課程決定已有越來越多的影響,並以多元的 方式施加影響,誠如藉由贊助或籌設新的計畫方案、提供誘因給學校、以及靠著扣押或不允准特定計畫方案的經費來提供對州層級教育體制的障礙因素/誘因。 政治協商沒有極神聖規則。為了解某些過程,研究一般常被詢問有關課程決定的四個高度政治問題是中肯的。而這四個問題與發起(initiating)、決 定(determining)、落實課程(implementing curriculum)、責任歸屬(who has responsibility)有關聯。 聯邦政府持續主動致力於發動新的計畫方案,如國家課程、國家閱讀寫作能力指標、國家規範。然而背後的政策決定似乎不甚清楚。雖然聯邦局透過他 們的財政誘因或者障礙因素試圖施加影響,但是州層級教育體制的理事仍然保有對課程架構、品質標準、和評量方面主要決定的權利。教師和學校校長仍舊是負責課程實施的主要人員;課程方面的責任則涉及學校層級人員和監控學生成就的體制層級人員。 這四個問題幫助我們解開些許課程決定的複雜性。然而並非所有課程方面的決定都總是合理的或甚至是明智的。雖然許多已作出的決定是曇花一現,但 是仍然也有持續了數十年的決定,最後反而變成很難去推翻。 |
英文摘要 | Curriculum decisions in Australia are largely the result of education decisions made at state and national (federal) levels. Although education is a state responsibility, in recent years the federal government has had a growing influence. It exerts influence in various ways such as by sponsoring or creating new programs, providing incentives for schools and providing disincentives/incentives for state education systems by withholding or not granting funds for particular programs. Political bargaining has no sacrosanct rules. It is pertinent to examine four highly political questions commonly asked about curriculum decision-making to understand some of the processes. The four questions relate to initiating, determining, implementing curriculum and who has responsibility. The federal government continues to take initiatives to develop new programs such as a national curriculum, national literacy and national benchmarks. The determination of policies is less clear. Although federal agencies attempt to wield influence through their financial incentives or disincentives, the directors of state education systems are still able to make major decisions about curriculum structures, quality standards, and assessment. Teachers and school principals continue to be the major persons responsible for the implementation of curricula. Responsibility for curricula can involve personnel at school-level and at system-level who monitor student achievements. These four questions help us to unpack some of the complexities of curriculum decision-making. Not all decision-making in curriculum is ever reasonable or even wise. Many decisions are made which turn out to be short-lived but then others persist which continue for many decades and in turn become very difficult to overturn. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。