查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 知識經濟指標之構念模型與跨群分析=Construct Model and Cross Group Analysis of Knowledge-Based Economy Indicators |
---|---|
作者 | 陳智凱; Chen, Chih-kai; |
期刊 | 實踐通識論叢 |
出版日期 | 20050100 |
卷期 | 3 2005.01[民94.01] |
頁次 | 頁115-150 |
分類號 | 550 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 知識經濟; 線性結構模型; 因素恆等性; 平均數結構檢定; Knowledge-based economy; KBE; LISREL; Factorial invariance; Mean structure test; |
中文摘要 | 近來各主要研究構機與國家,紛紛建構知經濟衡量指標。然而不同衡量單位之指標建構有時差異頗大,本研究旨在建構一套衡量知識經濟特質之總體模型,本文將指標分為五大構面:企業經營環境要創新系統、人力資源發展、資訊通訊科技、績效指標等。首先利用探索性因素分析(EFA)簡化龐雜指標,隨後進行二階驗性因素分析(SCFA),並且利用跨群因素恆等性分析,檢驗跨群因素結構之穩定性,同時估計跨群平均數結構模型之差異情形。總體而言,本文主要發展及重結論如下:總體知識經濟概念模型之的影響力排序,分別為資訊通訊科技、企業經營環境,人力資源系統、創新系統、績效指標。至於跨群因素恆等性檢定,透過相同因素結構模型,測量高低知識群是一個可以接受的方式;而在跨群平均數結構檢定方面,增加平均數及截距向量之後,整體模型適合度反而提高,並且未改變原來CFA之模型結構。 |
英文摘要 | Knowledge-Based Economy (KBE) was recently important issue of global competition. But numerous world KBE Scorecards still retained differences in terms of country ranking. The purpose of this study was to applying confirmatory factor analysis to decompose variations in KBE assessment into three sources, Likewise, to investigate the construct model of KBE. The data was 2002 World Development Indicators CD-Rom published by World Bank. Our approach was based on exploratory factor analysis, second order CFA and cross-group invariance test. Finally, our study concluded that, in order to construct the model of KBE, one need to look into the essentiality of information infrastructure, environment factors, education and human resources, innovation system factors together. The cross group factor invariance analysis and mean structure test. It was found that the factor structure of higher KBE cluster was similar to the lower KBE cluster, but better than in average performance. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。