查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 企業倫理中涉利者理論的證成:一個康德式的觀點=The Justification of the Stakeholder Theory--A Kantian Perspective |
---|---|
作 者 | 林永崇; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 32:8=375 2005.08[民94.08] |
頁 次 | 頁71-91 |
分類號 | 198.49 |
關鍵詞 | 股東論; 涉利者; 涉利者理論; 康德; 目的; 工具; 完全義務; 不完全義務; 財產; The stockholder theory; Stakeholder; The Stakeholder theory; Kant; Perfect duty; Imperfect duty; Property right; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在企業倫理中涉利者理論是股東論的競爭理論,這篇文章是要處理涉利者理論的規範證成,是用康德道德哲學的觀點來說明此一理論的合理根據。本文首先,康德認為,無論是個人或他人的人格中的人性都應該受到尊敬,決不可只當作工具看,而應當作一目的來看待,此即是人的內在價值。內在價值的尊嚴是不能以工具價值來交換的。 由此引申企業經理人在考量涉及利害關係者時,無論對待自己或他人,只要法律規限的權利範圍內都是「完全義務」必須履行的責任。但「不完全義務」並不是說可以忽略涉利者的內在價值,而是因為在法律權限尚無法清楚規範時,企業經理人暫時不能衡量涉利者的工具價值。 再者,本文從康德財產權的觀念來反省涉利者之間所謂財產擁有的意義。「公司」是由主要的核心涉利者,逐漸擴散到次要的涉利者,而乃至其他的涉利者的層層共同分享的結果。這種分享公司就是康德所謂法律上的、理智上的佔有之意。因此,不同的涉利者之間交換的利害關係,形成諸種複雜的工具價值,企業經理人也就需要考量不同的程度,而有不同的利害關係的分配之責任義務。 |
英文摘要 | This article is an attempt to apply the essential features of Kantian moral philosophy to the stakeholder theory. According to Kantian perspective, all stakeholders in business are the members of Kingdom of end so that they are treated not only mean but also end. Human beings ought to be respected because human beings have dignity. Kant differenced perfect duty from imperfect one. From this distinguish a corporative manager could consider different distribution among very stakeholder. This duty to oneself is a narrow and perfect one in terms of its quality; but all duties to one regarding the end of humanity in our own person, are wide and imperfect duties in terms of its degree. And Kant thought that the property right should be understood not only a right to a thing but also the sum of all the laws to do with things being yours or mine. So in a corporation those stakes may be any things which all the laws to do with things being different stakeholders. This thought challenges the conception of property right from the stockholder theory. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。