查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 國中組拳擊競賽成績之分析=The Analysis of the Junior-high Boxing Tournament |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 陳正博; 廖運榮; | 書刊名 | 國立體育學院論叢 |
| 卷 期 | 14:2 2004.04[民93.04] |
| 頁 次 | 頁47-62 |
| 分類號 | 528.971 |
| 關鍵詞 | 國中組; 拳擊; 競賽成績; Junior-high; Boxing tournament; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本研究之目的在探討臺灣地區國中組拳擊比賽現況,及實施「分齡拳賽」比賽制度之可行性。研究對象:以參加九十一年全國中等學校運動會 (以下簡稱為全中運) 拳擊比賽之國中組選手,共分為十四量級有152人舉行138場次比賽。研究方法:應用九十一年全中運拳擊比賽之實況比賽與評分紀錄資料,經描述性統計,卡方考驗等資料分析,獲得以下結果: 1.註冊報名參賽人數有244人,賽前過磅合格人數有152人,其過磅合格率為62%,合格率明顯偏低。 2不同年級的選手參賽人數均等分配適合度上明顯的不平均。 3.不同年級的選手在各量級參賽中,以二年級選手在各量級之參賽最多。 4.不同年級的選手在初賽、複賽時,以一年級失敗率達75.9%最高,進入決賽中,以三年級成功率50%獲勝最高。 5.勝負判決有七種方式,在138場比賽中裁判判定只採用三種,一為得分勝(W.P)有75場、二為裁定勝(R.S.C)有62場,三為棄權(Ret)有1場。 6.不同年級的選手在比賽得分方面,達顯著差異,一年級評0分的有22人次佔62.8%,三年級獲5分選手有64人次,佔了高達51.7%。 7.不同年級在比賽時中,高年級贏低年級的機率最高,達顯著的差異。 8.選手擭得前三名的比例為三年級為52.3%、二年級為42.9%、一年級為4.8%。 建議:以「年齡限制」作為規劃參賽組別依據,將國中階段拳擊比賽分為兩組,第一組為年滿13、未滿15歲;第二組為年滿15、未滿17歲,以提升國中階段的拳擊選手在拳擊比賽時有安全性、公平性與教育性。 |
| 英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to discuss the present status of the junior-high boxing tournament in Taiwan and to indicate whether it was possible to put 「age-group boxing tournament」 into practice. The objects of this study were the athletes who took part in the junior-high boxing tournament of National Mid-School Athletic Games in 2002. This tournament consisted of 14 weight classes and 138 boxing matches. In total there were 152 athletes who joined in the boxing tournament. The study method was to analyze the percentage and variances of the score data in the junior-high boxing tournament in 2002. The results were as follows: 1. There were 244 people who entered for this tournament. However, only 152 people passed the weight-in. So the qualified percentage of weight-in was 62%. 2. The age of the boxers in this tournament ranged from 13 to 16 years. About 48.9% of the boxers were 13-14 years old and 51.1% of the boxers were 15-16 years old. 3. No matter in which weight classes, there were more second-grade boxers than other-grace ones. 4. In the trial match and the semi-final, the chance to lose for first graders was about 75.9 % .As for in the final round, the chance to win for third graders was up to 50% that was the best among ail graders. 5. There were seven ways to judge victory. But only three of them were adopted in the 138 matches.75 matches were won by W.P., while 62 matches were by R.S.C. Only one match was by Ret. 6. As for the awarding of points, there were 22 first-grade boxers, about 62.8% of the total boxers, being awarded zero point. On the other hand, there were 64 third-grade boxers, about 51.796 of the total boxers, being awarded five points. 7. High graders proved to have more chances to win a game than low graders. 8. 4.8% of the top three places was won by first graders; 42.9% of the top three places was won by second graders; 52.3% of the top three places is won by third graders. Hence, I propose that age limit should be taken into consideration in dividing weight classes. More specifically, junior-high boxing tournament should be divided into two groups. Group one is for 13-14 year-old boxers. Group two is for 15-16 year-old boxers. Only in this way can we have a safer, fairer and more educational boxing tournament. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。