查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 帝國魅影--櫟社詩人王石鵬的國家認同=The Empire's Dream of Wang, Shi-Peng: A Poet's Constructing History of National Identity |
---|---|
作者 | 黃美娥; Haung, Mei-er; |
期刊 | 東海大學文學院學報 |
出版日期 | 20030700 |
卷期 | 44 2003.07[民92.07] |
頁次 | 頁222-246 |
分類號 | 782.88 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 櫟社; 王石鵬; 現代性; 國家認同; 臺灣三字經; Li club; Shi-Peng Wang; Modernity; National identity; Taiwanese Book of Three-Word-Character; |
中文摘要 | 櫟社,是日治時期臺灣三大詩社之一,王石鵬是櫟社社員中頗具知名度,但歷來卻鮮被研究的一位,本文利用當時的報章雜詩資料,嘗試勾勒這位曾經以《臺灣三字經》名聞一時的風雲人物之生平梗概。而在掌握其人其作的同時,筆者留意到王石鵬的政治意識其實存有流動認同的現象,此與櫟社中人素具強烈抗日精神的傳統形象有異。在追溯其人國家認同的建構歷程時,筆者發現流動認同現象之所以產生,實與石鵬熱衷新學以及高度肯定日人引進現代文明的時態有關;正因為「現代性」的魅惑,使先生在傾心現代化事物的同時,更加期盼日人能將此文明產物與制度一一輸入臺灣,以求達到同化之助,於是透過此種「同化」思維,遂加深了先生對於日本殖民母國的認同。另外,透過王石鵬的事例,筆者也留意到櫟社社與櫟社精神之間可能存在的斷裂關係,也就是櫟社雖說具有抗日精神,但其實並不代表所有櫟社社員自始至終的表現都可以完全吻合詩社性格,尤其1937年後櫟社精神出現了不同以往之鞏固而有了模稜、鬆動的面向。凡諸種種,都是現階段從事櫟社研究所當注意者。 |
英文摘要 | LI Club was one of the three largest Poetry Clubs in the Japanese Colonial Period of Taiwan. in LI Club, shi-Peng Wang was a famous member, however, the critics have paid little attention to his works. This essay uses newspapers and periodicals at that time with the purpose of depicting the life of this brilliant writer of Taiwanese Book of Three-Word-character. Further, it is observed that an element of a fowing identity exists in the poet’s ideology, which contrasts to the traditional image of the anti-Japanese spirit shared among Li Club members. In the search of the poet’s construction history of national identity, we discover that the poet is inclined to identify himself with the Japanese culture because of his enthusiasm to the New Study and his great appreciation of Japanese modernization. The poet expected that the Japanese would import the civilized products as well as modern systems to Taiwan so that Taiwan would benefit from the result of this cultural assimilation. Though the thinking of assimilation, the poet’s will became stronger to identify with the Colonial Native Land-Japan. On the other hand, by studying Wang’s story, we also notice that a breaking relationship possibly existed between the Club and the Club’s members. Even though the Club possessed the anti-Japanese spirit, it is not necessarily true that this spirit was shared by all the club members. Different from the club’s conventional solidarity, aspects of ambiguity and sense of looseness started to appear especially after the year of 1937. all the observations mentioned above are important issues for those researchers who are presently interested in the study of LI Club. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。