頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 明人元史學編年研究=A Chronological Survey on the Works by the Ming Historians Relative to the Yuan History |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃兆強; | 書刊名 | 東吳歷史學報 |
卷 期 | 9 2003.03[民92.03] |
頁 次 | 頁97-144 |
分類號 | 625.7 |
關鍵詞 | 史學; 明人元史學; 理學化史學; 通鑑綱目; 史評; Historiography; Yuan histories by the Ming authors; Neo-Confucian Historiography; Tongjiangangmu; Criticism on history; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文按明代元史著作成書或刊行先後,逐一予以述介、評論,一方面使讀者對明代的各種元史著作獲得一概括的認識,他方面亦使人對明代元史學的發展具備一整全的觀念。明代元史學的特質及發展與明代整個史學發展,以至學術的整體發展,其調子基本上是一致的。以理學為主軸,以倫常為判準的史學特色,終有明一代,未嘗稍減其聲價。通鑑綱目的著作充斥於元史學界;其他元史著作,非濃縮宋濂、王褘之《元史》而成簡編、節鈔,即針對元代史事人物而作臆斷、品評。史學求真的要義,則鮮有所聞。明繼元而興,其元史學之表現如是不厭人望,殊為可惜。當然,個別元史著作,或著作中之個別地方,仍有可取之處,此則不宜一筆抹殺。此讀者當可於本文各敘錄,尤其文末綜述中窺見之。 |
英文摘要 | The paper gives a critical account in a chronological way on the works relative to the Yuan history written or published in the Ming dynasty. To present a general survey of each work as well as the development of Ming historiography regarding the compilation of Yuan history is the two main objectives of the paper. The Ming authors’ Yuan history writings scarcely differ from the general Ming historiography tradition or differ from the general academic development of the period. The Ming historiography can be regarded as the embodiment of the Confucian ethics. The Ming historians were not much interested in the scientific investigation of the historical facts. Of course, a few historical works, or certain parts of the works, by the Ming authors on the Yuan history, are noteworthy. This can be revealed by the different entries, especially by the conclusion, of the paper. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。