查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- The Role of Schooling in Taiwan's Labor Market: Human Capital, Screening, or Credentialism?
- 學校教育在臺灣勞動市場的重要性:人力資本或文憑主義﹖
- 文憑主義的迷思:從勞工的薪資與雇主的徵才談起
- 以文憑還是以人力資本取才--臺灣地區實證研究
- 文憑主義在臺灣勞動市場的重要性--以學歷取才還是以人力資本取才
- 臺灣地區產業結構之變動與勞動生產力關聯之探討
- 新經濟移民法與勞動生產力並進,填補產業人力缺口
- A Direct Measurement of Wage Discrimination Against Females
- 臺灣地區藥物濫用社會成本推估初報
- 影響組織內部勞動市場因素之研究--以國內2000大製造業為例
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Role of Schooling in Taiwan's Labor Market: Human Capital, Screening, or Credentialism?=學校教育在臺灣勞動市場中扮演的角色:人力資本,篩選機制,或文憑主義? |
---|---|
作者 | 劉正; Liu, Jeng; Sakamoto,Arthur; Sakamoto,Arthur; |
期刊 | 臺灣社會學刊 |
出版日期 | 20021200 |
卷期 | 29 2002.12[民91.12] |
頁次 | 頁1-56 |
分類號 | 542.71 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 人力資本; 篩選標準; 文憑主義; 勞動生產力; Human capital; Screening; Credentialism; Labor productivity; |
中文摘要 | 個人的教育與其社會經濟成就之間有密切的關係。然而,這種關係係源自於其人力資本的增加與生產能力的提升?勞動市場之篩選?或僅是文憑主義的作用?則為有關社會階層化研究的普遍爭議。雖然,這三種說法對教育與社會經濟地位的關聯性所提出之理由各有不同,但卻未見學界有系統的比較各理論之適用性,也不曾對此等理論進行過決斷性的驗証。我們經由分析各種代表學校教育的量化指標對經濟生產力產生的影響效果,試圖釐清學校教育在勞動市場中所扮演的角色。實際操作上,本文使用了近二十年來的台灣人力運用調查資料及各相關的官方統計報告,以產業別為單位,分析了製造業勞工之教育成就與其平均生產力的關係。部分結果呈現出台灣勞動市場篩選的事實,但對人力資本理論的支持程度則更為明顯。 |
英文摘要 | A classic issue in social stratification is whether the correlation between an individual's education and his or her socioeconomic attainment is derived from increased productivity (i.e., human capital), labor market screening or simply from his or her credentials (credentialism). All three theories predict an association between education and socioeconomic status, but they differ with regard to the precise underlying causes of such a relationship. While previous research has largely avoided the challenge of empirically testing these three competing explanations, here we provide some relevant findings to tackle this research dilemma. More specifically, we investigate the effects of different measures of schooling on productivity so as to provide systematic evidence that is pertinent to distinguishing between the different perspectives in an empirical manner. The results of our analysis of recent data on productivity and schooling in Taiwanese manufacturing industries clearly support the view of education as productive human capital and provide limited backing for the notion of a mechanism for labor market screening. Since these results only pertain to the manufacturing sector, they cannot be used to generalize about the entire economy. Nonetheless, we conclude that our findings demonstrate that this difficult research problem can indeed be empirically investigated and that, in the future, researchers should consider revisiting the challenge of understanding the nature of the various effects of education on social stratification. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。