頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 以「歷史機制論」解析歐盟憲法倡議與憲政秩序建立間的競合=The Creation of a European Constitution: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis |
---|---|
作者 | 蘇宏達; | 書刊名 | 理論與政策 |
卷期 | 16:2=62 2002.06[民91.06] |
頁次 | 頁1-25 |
分類號 | 578.1641 |
關鍵詞 | 歐洲聯盟; 共同體法; 統合理論; 歐洲憲法; European constitution; European union; Constitutionalism; EC law; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 二OOO年六月廿七日,法國總統席哈克在德國下議院發表演說,倡議考慮制定「歐洲憲法」,正式揭各界關於 「歐洲憲法」的辯論,迄今未歇。二OO一年十二月十五日,歐盟高峰會發表「歐洲聯盟的未來」聲明,表示將 「歐盟在未來是否需要制定一部憲法」列入翌年三月一日起召開的「歐盟未來辯論大會」討論議題中,不僅是十七世紀以來呼籲制定「全歐憲法」理想的實踐,更呼應了歐盟五十餘年來建立「憲政秩序」已卓然有成的事實。然而,儘管以歐盟和歐體為核心的「泛歐憲政秩序」已儼然成形,且與當前關於制定「歐洲憲法」的倡議相互呼應,但是歐盟不可能通過修約或制憲,建造「歐洲聯邦」,而會依循現有趨勢,致力於上述「憲政秩序」的法典化,用以回應要求建立歐洲聯邦的壓力,同時化解關於統合路線的爭議。針對上述發展,以「憲政主權」概念為核心的「歷史機制論」遠較新功能途徑具有解釋力。依據這個理論,新的協議在短期內將可抵擋聯邦論的壓力,但長期看來,卻有可能反而加速了歐洲聯邦的建構。 |
英文摘要 | Since French President Jacques Chirac called for the creation of a European Constitution on June 27, 2000, a hot debate over the adoption of a European Constitution has developed at the European convention and all over Europe. Though this idea echoes well with the founding fathers of the EU, who never ceased dreaming of a European federation, the project of writing a constitution does not aim to build a federation as expected by the federalists. On the contrary, it was presented with the intention of resisting the federalist advance. As a result, it will not lead to the adoption of a new constitution, but only the codification of the existing pan European constitutional order based on EU/EC governance. This development can be well explained by historical institutionalism, according to which such a codification will relax the pressure for a European Federation in the short term, but accelerate its creation in the long run. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。