頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 不可追蹤解密器在電子投票及電子摸彩系統之實務應用=The Practical Application for Electronic Voting and Electronic Loting Systems Based on a Untraceable Decryptor |
---|---|
作者 | 廖鴻圖; 范修維; |
期刊 | 世新大學學報 |
出版日期 | 19981000 |
卷期 | 8 1998.10[民87.10] |
頁次 | 頁19-34 |
分類號 | 573.36 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 無記名電子投票; 不可追蹤之解密器; 電子摸彩系統; Untraceable decryptor; Anonymous electronic voting; Electronic loting; |
中文摘要 | 在無記名電子投票的文獻中,大部分的協定均需要政治立場不同的人員共同組成監票人員,並假設監票人員、選務人員及投票者不會共謀舞弊或洩密,方能達成無記名投票之基本要求。另外,大多數的協定僅能讓投票者驗証其所投之選票是否已被納入計算,但是當投票者提出控訴時,卻無法分辨是否有舞弊之情形,或是投票者無理的指控。再者,當選務人員與部分投票者在最後共謀竄改選票時,其他投票者亦無法提出有效之控訴。上述這些問題都導致這些協定在實際的應用中變得窒礙難行;因此,本文將針對這些問題提出一種新的策略,以不可追蹤之解密器配合簡單的投票協定,以達到實際可行之無記名電子投票策略;此外,本文亦針對所發展的不可追蹤之解密器應用於電子摸彩系統上。 |
英文摘要 | In the research of anonymous electronic voting schemes, the almost protocols need some scrutineers came from different political positions. In addition, assume that scrutineers, administrators and voters cannot cooperate to cheating or provide any individual privacy to anybody in order to assure the basic requirement of anonymous voting. However, the almost protocols can only satisfy the ability to verify whether the vote had been correctly counted in or not, but cannot trace the misconduct, conspiracy and cheating. Furthermore, when the administrators and voters cooperate to modify the voting result, the other voters cannot present an effective open objection. Therefore, how to prevent cheating and protect individual privacy are important issues. In this paper, any verified voter can cast only one vote and anonymous voting. Moreover, no one can counterfeit a valid ballot and any voter, after voting, can verify whether his vote have been correctly counted in. Furthermore, any misconduct during vote casting and vote counting can be traced. Therefore, in this study of our paper will significantly deliver theortical and practical contribution. I addition, we also present an electronic loting system based on the untraceable decryptor. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。